Abstract

This research work explores the profound structural changes undergone in the financial system of Pakistan in response to its top syturvy journey on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list. Beginning with an in-depth analysis of FATF's recommendations, the study also investigates the criticisms surrounding the FATF mechanism, including concerns about inconsistency, politicisation, and potential geo strategic influences. The paper also highlights Pakistan's regulatory enhancements, legislative reforms, and adoption of a risk-based approach to combating the financing of terrorism and anti-money laundering measures. The pinnacle of this transformative process is the successful exit of Islamabad from the FATF grey list in October 20-21, 2022. This research contributes valuable insights into the dynamic relationship between national regulatory reforms, international financial governance, and the broader implications for the economic stability and global standing of the country.

Key Words

Money Laundering, Terror Financing, Gray List, Structural Reforms, Risk-based Approach  

Since 2018, Pakistan has made significant structural changes in its financial system as a response to the challenges posed during its inclusion on the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list. The FATF, an intergovernmental organisation, aims to combat money laundering and terrorist financing by setting global standards and promoting the effective execution of these standards across jurisdictions. The inclusion of Pakistan in the FATF grey list prompted a series of structural reforms in its economic structure, leading to notable transformations in its financial landscape. 


The initiation of the FATF journey in Pakistan was marked by several concerns raised by the international community regarding combating the financing of terrorism (CFT) measures and the effectiveness of its anti-money laundering (AML). To address these structural lacunae, FATF provided a set of recommendations to Pakistan. These recommendations spanned various areas, including regulatory enhancements, legal reforms, improvements in financial supervision, and subsequently the adoption of a risk-based approach to AML/CFT measures (Rahman & Ahmed, 2023).

However, criticism of the FATF mechanism has been voiced by various quarters since its establishment. Some critics argue that the evaluation process may lack consistency and transparency, leading to disparities in outcomes for different countries. The subjectivity in the potential geopolitical considerations in evaluations and interpretation of AML/CFT standards have also been areas of concern. Additionally, several concerns have also been raised about the impact of stringent AML/CFT regulations on the financial inclusion of the countries and the potential unintended consequences of such measures (Hasan, 2021).

Pakistan, in response to several recommendations from FATF and under intense regional and international scrutiny, embarked on a journey of structural changes in its financial system. Legislative reforms were undertaken by the country to strengthen its legal framework, and financial institutions such as the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SECP) underwent enhanced regulatory measures and supervision. The risk-based approach became central to the strategy, allowing financial institutions to more targeted interventions in areas with higher risks of money laundering and terror financing (Rana, 2022).

The culmination of this transformative process in the financial system occurred in October 2022 when Pakistan successfully exited the FATF grey list. This achievement signifies the commitment of the country to implementing vigorous AML/CFT measures and aligning itself with FATF standards. The successful exit holds profound implications for the economic stability, financial system, and global standing of Pakistan (Hussain, 2022).

This journey, from facing FATF scrutiny to implementing comprehensive economic reforms and eventually exiting the grey list, underscores the dynamic nature of international financial governance. As Pakistan emerges from this chapter successfully, it stands poised to contribute valuable insights into navigating FATF’s challenges of maintaining financial integrity while fostering economic inclusivity and growth (Sherani, 2022). The following section will explore the various facets of the financial transformation of Pakistan, shedding light on the successes achieved, lessons learned, and the ongoing commitment to a transparent and secure financial environment. 

Overview of FATF and its role in Global Financial Regulations

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is an intergovernmental organisation that was established back in 1989 to combat terrorist financing and money laundering. The primary goal of the FATF is to set international standards and regulations and promote effective execution and implementation of operational, legal, and regulatory measures for combating terror financing, money laundering, and other related threats such as weak regulatory oversight of the integrity of the international financial system. Some of the important aspects of FATF and its role in global financial regulations include:

Establishment and Membership

The FATF was created by the G7 (Group of Seven) in 1989 in response to global growing concerns about the use of the international and financial system for illicit activities. It is a policy-making body comprising members of 39 member countries, including the European Commission and the Gulf Cooperation Council. 

Role and Objectives

The primary role and objective of the FATF is to set standards and promote the implementation of operational, legal, and regulatory measures to combat terror financing, money laundering, and proliferation financing. The FATF suggests recommendations, which are a set of comprehensive financial measures that countries are encouraged to adopt and implement. These recommendations are periodically updated to address emerging and changing challenges and risks. 

Mutual Evaluations

Member countries are subject to mutual evaluations, where their AML/CFT regimes are assessed for compliance with FATF or international standards. The evaluations are conducted by FATF members and focus on a legal framework, regulatory measures of the country, and the effectiveness of its AML/CFT systems. 

Blacklisting

The FATF maintains a list of countries that are deemed to have financial lacunae or strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regimes. Countries on the FATF blacklist, also known as the "Non-Cooperative Countries or Territories (NCCTs)," may face international restrictions and sanctions from international trade regimes.




Recommendations and Guidance

In addition to the core recommendations, the FATF also issues guidance on several issues to NCCT jurisdiction to assist countries in implementing effective measures. The FATF works closely with numerous other international bodies, such as the World Bank, the United Nations, and the International Monetary Fund, to promote global cooperation in combating financial crime. 

Global Influence

The standards and recommendations of the FATF have a significant impact on global financial jurisdiction and institutions. Many countries across the world align their national regulations and laws with FATF standards to avoid financial and reputational risks.




Adaptation to Emerging Risks

The FATF continually adapts its standards to address emerging and new risks, including those associated with cryptocurrencies, virtual assets, and new technologies that could be exploited for terrorist financing and money laundering (Tamplin, 2023).

Exploring Financial Revamps: States Revitalising After FATF Evaluation

Several countries have undergone or are in the process of structural revamping or financial reforms in response to post-FATF scrutiny. It's important to note that the status of countries' compliance with FATF standards can change, and new developments and adaption of emerging risks may have occurred with every passing day. The following section will explain the examples of countries that have faced or are facing financial reforms in the context of FATF scrutiny:

Pakistan

Pakistan has been on and off the FATF's "gray list" due to concerns related to terrorist financing and money laundering. The timeline of Pakistan’s inclusion in gray-listing includes February 2008 to June 2010, from February 2012 to February 2015, and from June 2018 to October 2022. The country has implemented various structural reforms in its legal and regulatory framework to address FATF recommendations and maintain international standards. This also includes enhancing its AML/CFT measures (Shah et al., 2023).




Iran

Iran has been facing scrutiny from the FATF and on the High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action (blacklist) along with North Korea and Myanmar for a decade, primarily related to concerns about money laundering and terrorist financing. Some of the outstanding issues of the FATF Action Plan on Iran include criminalizing terrorist financing, freezing terrorist assets, installation of an independent financial intelligence unit, etc. The country has engaged in numerous reforms to improve its AML/CFT framework, however, its status on the FATF list has been subject to periodic reviews (Beizayi, 2023).




Turkey

Turkey has been on and off the FATF's "grey list" since 2011 and made significant progress actively in improving its AML/CFT regime in response to FATF evaluations and recommendations. The compliances include the installation of a financial intelligence unit, reporting of suspicious financial transactions in several enterprises, tipping off the transactions and by-passing confidentiality, extradition, and mutual legal assistance, etc.  Moreover, reforms also include updates to legislation processes and regulations to align with regional and international standards set by the FATF. Turkey is still on FATF grey list as of 2023 with 23 other countries (Singh, 2023). 

Mayanmar

Myanmar has been facing scrutiny from the FATF and on the High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action (blacklist) since the start of the twenty-first century with a timeline for “black-list” of June 2001 to October 2006 and from October 2011 to February 2016. Moreover, for “grey-listing” the timeline includes from February to October 2016, and again from February 2020 to October 2022. Burma is still emplaced on the FATF blacklist with Iran and North Korea as the country is facing several challenges related to financial crimes and money laundering, leading to its inclusion in the FATF process. The country has been actively working on legal and regulatory reforms to strengthen its AML/CFT mechanism (Islam, 2022).

Malta

Some serious strategic deficiencies were identified by the FATF regime in Malta in June 2021 related to the pursuit of tax-based money laundering cases utilising financial intelligence, the detection of inaccurate information on company ownership, and sanctions on several gatekeepers who failed to obtain accurate beneficial ownership information. However, Malta has made significant efforts to enhance its AML/CFT measures to comply with FATF standards. Malta pledges to work with MONEYVAL to continue to sustain its improvements in its AML/CFT system (Wellbank, 2022).  

Pakistan's Financial Regulatory Landscape in the Pre FATF Era

Pakistan falls in the category of those developing countries with the under-documentation or non-documentation of economic activities, stimulating Islamabad’s frequent inclusion in the FATF gray list. The non-documentation of Pakistan’s economy can be linked to several issues that are a source of concern to the FATF:




Money Laundering Risk

The under-documented or non-documented economic activities can provide several opportunities for money laundering. Without proper oversight and documentation, it becomes easier for illicit funds and informal money transfers to be integrated into the economic system of the country.




Terrorist Financing Risk

The undocumented and informal economic sectors may also be vulnerable to exploitation for terrorist financing purposes. The lack of a transparent mechanism makes it difficult for authorities to prevent or track the movement of funds from being used to support terrorist activities (Khan, 2023).

Weak Regulatory Oversight

The informal economic sectors often operate with limited regulatory oversight. Subsequently, this can result in weak enforcement of Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations, making it challenging for law enforcement authorities to first detect and then prevent illicit financial activities.

Tax Evasion and Illicit Financial Flows

Non-documentation is also often associated with and provides room for tax evasion, as individuals and businesses operating in the informal sector may not report their full monthly pay or income taxes. This can facilitate illicit financial flows and contribute to revenue losses for the government.

Limited Transaction Monitoring

In the absence of proper documentation in the country, financial transactions may also go unmonitored. This lack of visibility in the financial sector makes it quite difficult for law execution and enforcement authorities to implement effective transaction monitoring and surveillance systems to detect fishy or suspicious activities.

Challenges in Beneficial Ownership Identification

Non-documented economic activities can pose several challenges in identifying beneficial ownership of assets and companies. This lack of transparency makes it difficult to trace the true owners of businesses and assets, increasing the risk of misuse for illicit purposes.

Non-documented sectors may also rely on informal money transfer systems that operate outside the regulated financial channels. These informal money transfer systems can be exploited for terror financing and money laundering (Dar, 2022). 

Addressing the issues related to non-documentation of the economy is a key component of efforts in Pakistan to comply with FATF standards. The country is required to implement measures to strengthen regulatory frameworks, enhance transparency, and improve oversight to mitigate different risks associated with non-documented economic activities. This includes reforms in areas such as transaction monitoring, beneficial ownership reporting, and regulatory enforcement. As Pakistan continues to take steps to address these issues, it aims to demonstrate its commitment to combating financially driven crimes and to meet the international monetary standards set by the FATF.

Events Leading to Pakistan's Inclusion in FATF Grey List

The inclusion of Pakistan in the FATF grey list is the result of several events and identified financial lacunae (weaknesses) in its CTF/AML frameworks. The process leading to inclusion typically involves evaluations, assessments, and determination by the FATF based on identified structural deficiencies. The following section will first explain the events and later the events and structural weaknesses that contributed to the inclusion of Pakistan in the FATF grey list:

Increased Scrutiny

The FATF, a global body monitoring financial systems, undertakes routine assessments of both member and non-member countries to gauge their adherence to CTF/AML standards. The intensified scrutiny faced by Pakistan since 2018 resulted from substantial concerns regarding the efficacy of its CTF and AML frameworks. This structural scrutiny is pivotal for maintaining the integrity and transparency of the regional and international financial system, with the FATF serving as a crucial international watchdog. The assessment process is comprehensive, evaluating the stoutness of regulations and mechanisms of the country to combat financial crimes. In the case of Pakistan, the spotlight was specifically cast on the CTF and AML regimes, necessitating a thorough examination of their effectiveness by the FATF regime. This increased scrutiny signifies the commitment of the global community to curbing illicit economic activities and ensuring nations implement stringent measures to safeguard against terror financing and money laundering. Hence, the evaluation process aims to foster international cooperation and enhance financial security in combating these threats.




Global Terrorism Financing Concerns

The FATF, working in conjunction with regional and international partners, has raised massive apprehensions regarding the plausible exploitation of the financial system of Pakistan for terrorism financing. This heightened global concern stems from the undeniable presence of militant groups and intricate geopolitical contexts in the region. The regional and international community recognises the important role financial systems play in hindering or facilitating terrorist activities, making the assessment of the financial landscape of Pakistan crucial. Given the complicated web of continuously evolving geopolitical dynamics, the risk of terror financing becomes more pronounced. The FATF, as a global watchdog, is keenly aware of the potential negative consequences of inadequately monitored financial systems regionally and globally to harbour militant groups. The collaboration with regional and international partners underscores the gravity of the terror financing concerns, emphasising the need for comprehensive measures to thwart any use of the financial infrastructure for militant-related activities. This collective concern amplifies the urgency for international cooperation and stringent regulatory measures to ensure the vigour of the financial mechanisms of Pakistan in preventing terrorism financing (Karim & Hayat, 2022).

References

• Ahmed, S. H. (2021, March 21). Economy faces structural issues. Express Tribune.
• Akhtar, N., Khan, A., & Raza, M. (2023). Technological Advancements and Legal Challenges to Combat Money Laundering: Evidence from Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(1), 473-483
• Beizayi, H. (2023, August 8). Impact of FATF blacklisting on Iran in 2023: trade, diplomacy, and blocked funds challenges. Iran News Wire.
• Bukhari, H., Haq, I., & Shakoori, A. R. (2022, December 16). Cross-border illegal currency movement. Brecorder.
• Dar, A. W. (2022, September 23). Pakistan’s undocumented economy: Benefit or burden in the face of natural disasters? Dawn.com.
• Gilmour, N., & Hicks, T. (2023). Global watchlists: money laundering risk indicators or something else? Bristol University, 105–125.
• Gul, I. (2018, February 25). FATF saga: Lessons for Pakistan. Times of Islamabad
• Hasan, S. (2021, August 5). How FATF Has Been Misused for Political Purposes Around the World. TRT.
• Hussain, A. (2022, October 21). Pakistan removed from global ‘terrorism’ financing list. Al Jazeera.
• Hussain, A. (2022, October 22). It’s a huge relief for nation. Brecorder.
• Islam, S. M. S. (2022, November 29). Why is Myanmar on the blacklist of FATF? The Geopolitics.
• Karim, S., & Hayat, U. (2019, June 10). Pakistan on FATF’s grey list: what, why, and why now? Dawn.com.